Annotated Bibliography Peer Review

For the most part both of my peers: Rachel and Brandon, did very well with their annotations. Both had a very good handle on following the guidelines of an Annotation and how Maddie wanted us to format. They stuck to the 3 paragraph guideline and format it with the right questions within each paragraph. They were both good at answering all of the required questions for an Annotated bibliography. Neither of them had problems with their citations, just remembering to indent starting at the second line of your citation. The only real problem I saw was being sure the first paragraph gives enough credibility to the author and starts off with their credibility, so that way everything you read after you know you can trust. Also keeping paragraph sizes consistent, its not bad to write a lot in one paragraph versus another, you just don't want to have one 10 sentence paragraph followed by a 2 sentence paragraph. I made sure to stress to my peers the importance of connecting your sources back in a way meaningful to the topic. My peers did include the connections but I was more interested to see if they could connect them for different ways other than the fact they were on the same topic. Overall I thought they both did very well there sources were credible sources from the library resource, and they picked sources that they could utilize fully in their essays. They used the correct formatting other than a few minor errors, but no major problems.

Taggart, Amanda and Gloria Crisp. "The Role of Discriminatory Experiences on Hispanic

Students' College Choice Decisions." Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 33, no. 1, 01 Feb. 2011, pp. 22-38. EBSCOhost, login.proxy.lib.fsu.edu/login?url=http://sear ch. ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric &AN= EJ912131&site=eds-live.

Author. “Name of Source/Title.” Journal Name/Source Name,Volume/pg number, dd, mon. year. Contributor/2nd Source. Doi (if applicable). Link